<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meet the Candidates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fairvoteubc.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/meet-the-candidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fairvoteubc.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/meet-the-candidates/</link>
	<description>Students do care about voting...but voting sucks! Let&#039;s fix it!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:51:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ratel</title>
		<link>http://fairvoteubc.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/meet-the-candidates/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairvoteubc.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-29</guid>
		<description>LOL! that&#039;s awesome.  very true, hesitating to move to some proportional system because its not &#039;right yet&#039; is very questionable.  We&#039;ve already failed to pass it twice now (once in BC and once in Ontario), how many chances will we get before people give up for a long time?  I see the provincial process as a test run for national reform, let one province try STV and one MMP and we can decide later which is better. But they are all , way better than first past the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL! that&#8217;s awesome.  very true, hesitating to move to some proportional system because its not &#8216;right yet&#8217; is very questionable.  We&#8217;ve already failed to pass it twice now (once in BC and once in Ontario), how many chances will we get before people give up for a long time?  I see the provincial process as a test run for national reform, let one province try STV and one MMP and we can decide later which is better. But they are all , way better than first past the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smith</title>
		<link>http://fairvoteubc.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/meet-the-candidates/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairvoteubc.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Arguing about whether STV or MMP should be used to replace FPTP is like arguing about whether a Honda or a Toyota should be used to replace your horse-drawn wagon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arguing about whether STV or MMP should be used to replace FPTP is like arguing about whether a Honda or a Toyota should be used to replace your horse-drawn wagon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://fairvoteubc.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/meet-the-candidates/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairvoteubc.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Anyone know what voting procedure is used in these metro board elections? I assume it&#039;s &quot;first past the post&quot;, one seat with no (instant) run-off for each electoral area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know what voting procedure is used in these metro board elections? I assume it&#8217;s &#8220;first past the post&#8221;, one seat with no (instant) run-off for each electoral area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smith</title>
		<link>http://fairvoteubc.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/meet-the-candidates/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairvoteubc.wordpress.com/?p=120#comment-8</guid>
		<description>BC-STV is a form of proportional representation. Charles Menzies seems regrettably uninformed.

Don&#039;t be uninformed: http://stv.ca</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BC-STV is a form of proportional representation. Charles Menzies seems regrettably uninformed.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be uninformed: <a href="http://stv.ca" rel="nofollow">http://stv.ca</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
